‘Claims-Made’ versus ‘Occurrence’ Policies

Claims_Made_vs_Occurrence_CoverageWHAT YOU DON’T KNOW CAN HURT YOU.

As an investor, especially a commercial buyer or general contractor, there are some things you should definitely be aware of regarding your liability insurance.  The same holds true if you are a licensed Realtor or mortgage professional with Errors and Omissions coverage.

When purchasing an insurance policy, especially general and professional liability, there are two different types of policy forms to choose from; ‘Occurrence’ and ‘Claims-Made’.  While as a consumer you may have never heard of either of these insurance terms, they can have a huge impact on how (or even if) you are covered when a loss occurs.

‘Occurrence’ forms cover losses that happen (occur) during the time that the policy itself is actually in force. The loss can be reported months or years later after you have switched companies or the policy is no longer in effect, the key is when the loss actually happened. If it occurred while the policy is in force, when it is actually reported in the future is irrelevant.  Occurrence forms, in the opinion of this author, are more valuable because they respond to claims brought about years later.

A ‘claims-made’ policy differs in that it only covers claims that are made while the policy is in force.  For example, if a ‘claims-made’ policy expired on February 1st and a claim was submitted for work performed on January 1st, there is no coverage because it was made outside of the policy’s effective term.

As the name indicates, ‘claims-made’ policies provide coverage only for those claims made during the time the policy is in force. These policies provide coverage only so long as you continue to pay premiums for the initial policy and any subsequent renewals. Once premiums stop, the coverage also stops for any claims not known or made to the insurance company during the coverage period.  What this means is that there is a risk of an unknown or unreported claim being made long after the policy period expires and it not being covered because the claim was made outside of the coverage period.

As you may imagine, moving from one type of policy to the other can be difficult – and dangerous.  A claims-made form is okay is the right situations, but it has no guarantee of continued insurability, so if you are, for some reason, cancelled by an insurance company or you decide to shop prices and you switch to another policy to save money, you may not have coverage in the future for work or activities performed in the past. Some important aspects of ‘claims-made’ policies that you should be aware of include:

•    the retrospective date;
•    extended reporting periods, also known as ‘tail’ coverage (explained below).

If you do move from one insurer to the next with ‘claims-made’ coverage, you must (should) purchase tail coverage or your new insurer must (should) include a prior acts endorsement. With this endorsement, the new insurer assumes coverage for the prior acts occurring in the other carrier’s coverage period.  Generally speaking, ‘claims-made’ policies usually cost less than an ‘occurrence-form’ policy, but you run the risk of not being covered for a potential claim because you didn’t discover it until after your policy expired. As with all other aspects of insurance, the decision is a gamble or calculated risk that you as the insured party must make, and you will usually pay a higher premium in order to lower your risk.

‘Tail coverage’, which may cost more if you want to purchase it, picks up where a claims-made policy leaves off, covering occurrences that happened while the policy was effective, but claimed after the policy expired. As a result, the combination of a claims-made policy and tail coverage looks very much like an occurrence policy, with one critical difference. When an occurrence policy expires, the premiums stop while the coverage (on occurrences that happen during the policy period) continues indefinitely. Tail coverage, on the other hand, is something you purchase after your claims-made policy expires, and you continue to pay for it until you decide that the risk of discovering an old occurrence no longer outweighs the cost of the tail coverage premium.

Full tail coverage (which can sometimes be up to 200% of the policy’s original annual premium) is essential when you retire from business or when you change insurers or policies. When changing insurers, you must carefully consider the ‘true cost’ of cheaper coverage (due to its limited exposure) against the other cost of purchasing “tail” coverage from your old carrier.

Basic ‘tail coverage’ is sometimes free of charge but covers only those claims that have been reported during the policy period or 60 to 90 days thereafter and while the original limit is not yet exhausted.  Supplemental ‘tail coverage’ must be purchased to cover claims that were not reported during this period.  Both coverages apply only to claims stemming from injuries or damage that occurred during the policy period back to the retroactive date.  It does not cover claims that occurred prior to such date, nor those occurring after the policy expires.

To put it more simply, the cost of an ‘occurrence’ policy is higher, but fixed, whereas the cost of a claims-made/tail coverage combination is initially lower, but of longer duration and potentially of higher total cost.  The decision of which to buy effectively hinges on the nature of your perceived risks.

If your business or work is such that any liability is immediately apparent – and thus claimable – you are probably safe with a claims-made policy.  However, if your potential liability can go undetected for a long period of time, such as with a company that pours residential foundations which may fail three years in the future, then you may be best served with an occurrence policy.

‘Occurrence-Based’ Coverage

‘Occurrence’ coverage, as’ already mentioned, is insurance that provides coverage for the act when it occursregardless of when it is reported. If you had coverage under an occurrence policy in 2005 and the claim is reported today (the foundation dropped, improper wiring caused a fire, etc) then the claim is covered.

‘Claims-Made’ versus ‘Occurrence’ – Which Policy Type Should You Choose?

To most insurance consumers, especially those concerned with only the price alone, this whole topic can be more than a little confusing.  In an effort to simplify the decision-making process of which policy type is right for you, you should look at the major differences below.

•    Premium Cost – ‘Claims-made’ policies are often much less expensive than ‘occurrence-based’ policies. The premium difference can be negligible or, depending upon the carrier, it may be as much as 50% or more.

•    Coverage Amount – Under an occurrence policy, coverage is the amount of coverage under the policy in the year of the occurrence. So, if you were just starting out in business or you were trying to save money and you opted for only $100,000 of coverage versus the standard $1,000,000 used by most policies, you may be under-insured against a claim (and legal fees) arising in the future for you work or activities performed in the past.  A ‘claims-made’ policy covers you at the level of insurance you have when the claim is made.

•   Long Term Cost – If you begin with a ‘claims-made’ policy from the start, it may be cheaper in the long-term if you maintain this claims-made coverage from now on as you may save a great deal in annual premium each year over an ‘occurrence’ policy. However, if you begin with an ‘occurrence’ form, you should make certain that your initial limits of coverage are adequate to cover any future claims that may arise years from now.  You may pay more in premiums, but you have the peace of mind in knowing that you will always be covered against losses occurring during this policy period.

•    Choice of Insurers – This is more important that it may first appear. Believe it or not, insurers can and do go out of business for any number of reasons.  It is uncommon, but it does happen. If you elect coverage from an insurer with a lower AM-Best financial rating, there is a chance that the insurer may become insolvent and that it may not be around to address any claim that may be filed against your policy in the future – which means that you are uninsured. If you have purchased an ‘occurrence’ form from a lower-rated insurer and that insurer becomes insolvent three years after your policy expires, and then a claim resulting from a latent-defect is made in the fourth year, you have no insurance protection at all.

•    Type of Business – Certain businesses or industries must have occurrence policies or have a risk policy in place that guarantees the purchase of prior acts endorsements and tail coverage without fail. Construction businesses (including ‘rehabbing’ and remodeling) where defects may not be discovered for years, are good examples of candidates for this type of coverage. Other businesses have a much lower risk of claims occurring much past the transaction with the customer (such as a mechanic) and can safely choose ‘claims-made’ coverage.

•    Availability – Since ‘occurrence’ coverage keeps the insurer ‘on the hook’ for future claims for an indefinite period of time, they are obviously less inclined to offer this type of coverage form, especially for specific high-risk industries like automobile manufacturing where product recalls, costing hundreds of millions of dollars, may occur many years after the policy is out of force and no premiums have been paid.  While ‘occurrence’ forms are still available, ‘claims made’ policies are what are normally issued by most insurance carriers these days.

If you have questions, or you would like to speak with someone regarding liability insurance or exposure, please feel free to call our offices at (800) 299-8994 or (512) 986-6124 and we will be happy to answer any questions that you may have.

Worker’s Comp and How It May Affect You As An Investor

MoneyWastedWhat does Worker’s Compensation insurance have to do with your investing in real estate? More than you might think, especially if you operate your own ‘rehab’ or make-ready crews or employ anyone for any period of time.

More likely than not, if you are in the business of purchasing and remodeling real estate to any degree and you use the same contractors or labor to perform the work, you are probably considered an ‘employer’ and you are fully liable and legally-responsible for any and all injuries that occur to any worker while employed by you. This includes falls, lacerations, eye injuries, burns, and anything else that might occur.

With worker’s compensation premiums considered ‘unnecessary’ by most small investing, construction, and contracting companies, many businesses are tempted to buy less-expensive ‘alternative’ policies such as non-subscription agreements or limited-benefit health insurance. The fact is, however, there is no realistic alternative to worker’s compensation. The Texas Worker’s Compensation Act limits employer liability only when a business has an actual worker’s compensation policy from a licensed insurance carrier or has been certified to ‘self insure’ by the Texas Worker’s Compensation Commission (part of TDI). There are no exceptions.

A business that drops or chooses not to carry worker’s compensation – sometimes referred to as ‘going bare’ – faces unlimited liability if an injured employee can prove the employer was negligent to any degree – no matter how slight or negligible. Employers that substitute ‘alternative’ accident and health policies, non-subscription plans, purchase worker’s compensation from unlicensed companies, or purchase excess employer’s indemnification insurance have far less protection than those with actual worker’s compensation coverage. You should know that if you, as an employer, choose to opt-out of the worker’s compensation system and ‘go bare’, you face unlimited liability and business ruination. It simply isn’t worth the risk.

What ‘GOING BARE’ Cost One Business

As an example, the owners of a former Texas mortuary learned the high cost of operating without worker’s compensation insurance – ’going bare’ – when a federal bankruptcy judge ordered the immediate sale of their business. The order climaxed a four-year legal battle with a former employee who received an electrical shock from an embalming machine.

Having chosen not to purchase worker’s compensation insurance, the funeral-home owners faced unlimited financial liability. In addition, the employers were barred by law from raising defenses such as the worker’s own negligence, his acceptance of the risk, and the negligence of fellow employees. Under the Texas Worker’s Compensation Act, if an employer’s negligence played any role in an injury (no matter how slight), the employer bears full legal responsibility.

A state district court ordered the mortuary owners to pay the injured worker $476,800. Unable to pay, the owners filed for bankruptcy but were ordered to sell their business to pay the judgment.

Worker’s Compensation Subscribers

When an employer is covered by a worker’s compensation policy, all financial responsibility for a job-related injury in transferred to the employer’s insurance company. The injured worker is compensated according to the Texas Worker’s Compensation Commission’s schedule of benefits based on the type and severity of the injury.

The insurance carrier pays all reasonably required medical bills related to the injury, even if the need for some treatments doesn’t arise for several years. Indemnity and disability payments are calculated as a percentage of the worker’s pre-injury salary – up to a limit. In addition, the Texas Property and Casualty Guaranty Fund protects all licensed insurance companies and their customers should they become insolvent.

Going Bare

  • Without a worker’s compensation policy from a licensed insurance company, the employer cannot use evidence to show that an employee’s own negligence or the negligence of a fellow employee contributed to the accident;
  • The employer also cannot present evidence that an injured employee knew of the risk and voluntarily assumed it; and,
  • The employee may be awarded a monetary judgment of non-economic losses, such as pain and suffering or punitive damages.

An employer who is found negligent in any way bears full financial responsibility for the loss, even if the employee’s own negligence played a great role in causing the injury. With unlimited liability and no protection against awards for pain, suffering, and punitive damages, there is no ceiling on potential court judgments. Defense-related legal expenses are also the employer’s responsibility.

Alternative” Coverage

Some Texas employers have elected to purchase life, accident, health, and disability policies as cheaper alternatives to worker’s compensation. Texas Department of Insurance rules prohibit these insurance companies from representing these coverages as substitutes for worker’s compensation. Typically, these policies have a ceiling on medical benefits and disability payment to replace the employees lost income are based on the employee’s salary and payments last a maximum of 52 weeks.

Assuming an employer’s ‘alternative’ policy has a $100,000 medical cap, a $400 weekly salary cap, and a 52 week payment period, the insurance company’s maximum payout would be $120,800 for a single accident. This would cover only a small fraction of the $476,800 judgment against the mortuary owner in the case previously described. Not only are benefits capped, but ‘alternative’ policies do not provide protection against judgments for pain and suffering, punitive damages, or legal fees.

‘1099’ versus W-2 Workers (Independent Subcontractors vs. Employees)

It is a common misconception that workers paid on a 1099 basis (as opposed to a W-2) are ‘independent contractors’ instead of actual employees and therefore the employer is not liable in the event of an injury. This is completely untrue and a dangerous falsehood for employers.

The fact is that in many cases, the only difference between workers paid on a 1099 (independent contractor) basis as opposed to a W-2 is simply an IRS status identifying which party is responsible for paying employer taxes. That’s it. From the standpoint of the Department of Labor, the general rule is that an individual is an independent contractor if the organization for which the services are performed has the right to control or direct only the result of the work, and not what will be done and how it will be done or method of accomplishing the result. However, whether an individual is an employee or independent contractor depends on the facts in each case.

  • Behavioral Control – a worker is an employee when the business has the right to direct and control the worker (work and arrival times, drug testing, work standards, on-the-job behaviors, dress code, training, etc.) The business does not have to actually direct or control the way the work is done as long as it has the right to direct and control the work and/or the worker itself/himself.
  • Financial Control - if the worker has a significant personal investment in the work (ie: purchased materials or other labor paid for by the worker) and his expenses are not reimbursed, he may be an independent contractor. He may also be considered an independent contractor if he can realize a profit or incur a loss.
  • Relationship of the Parties – if you provide any benefits such as insurance, paid time off, etc. to a worker, it is an indication that he or she is an employee. A written contract may show what the parties intend if it the relationship is otherwise unclear.

Unlicensed Companies

The Texas Worker’s Compensation Act does not recognize policies issued by unlicensed companies, including those doing business on a surplus lines basis. Like employers who elect to ‘go bare’, those with policies from unlicensed companies forfeit contributory negligence protection and face unlimited liability. In addition, an employer who deals with these companies has nowhere to turn but the courts if a company cannot or will not pay a claim filed on behalf of the injured worker. In addition, the Texas Property and Casualty Guaranty Fund does not cover these companies.

Employer’s Risk Comparison

 

Worker’s Compensation

“Alternative” Policy

No Coverage (Going Bare)

Unauthorized Policy

Who Determines The Benefit Levels Paid?

Texas Law

Court

Court

Court

Who Pays Medical and       Lost Income Costs?

Insurance Carrier

Insurance Carrier (to policy limits) Employer Pays Balance

Employer

Insurance Carrier (to policy limits) Employer Pays Balance

Who Pays Legal Fees?

Insurance Carrier

Governed By The Policy

Employer

Governed By The Policy

Are Benefits Protected by State Guaranty Assn?

YES

Limited At Best

NO

NO

Can Injured Worker Win Judgment For Pain, Suffering, & Punitive Damages?

NO

YES

YES

YES